11/01/2024

These are her remarks today and they are different from the remarks she has made from day to day. Which adds up to she says what she needs to say for the moment to get elected. She is not an honest person.

The Flim Flam artist! I think Biden is trying to tell the American people – don’t vote for her.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-fatal-flaw-in-kamala-harris-speech-marred-by-biden-s-garbage-comment/ar-AA1tfmgo?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=d673c6139f4644d7b3dd2f89370aa8dd&ei=19

ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-fatal-flaw-in-kamala-harris-speech-marred-by-biden-s-garbage-comment/ar-AA1tfmgo?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=d673c6139f4644d7b3dd2f89370aa8dd&ei=19

The fatal flaw in Kamala Harris’ speech, marred by Biden’s ‘garbage’ comment© Provided by FOX News

Jeff Bezos defending his decision to end the Washington Post

FOX News

Bezos’ ‘colossal blunder’ has set Washington Post back 10 years, Howard Kurtz says

The optics were perfect. The crowd was massive. The media reviews were glowing.

But there was a fundamental contradiction at the heart of Vice President Kamala Harris’ speech on the Ellipse that virtually no one is talking about. 

First, I’ll give the vice president her due. It was a well-written address and strongly delivered. It contained a fair amount of policy, such as Medicare payments for home health care and aid to first-time home buyers.

INTERVIEWING DONALD TRUMP: A LAST-MINUTE BLITZ AND NEW CLOSING MESSAGE

Harris acknowledged that many voters were just getting to know her. She mentioned her mom and her middle-class upbringing, as she always does. She said she’s not perfect and makes mistakes.

But the backbone of the speech was a two-fisted, no-holds-barred attack on former President Donald Trump.

Harris likened him to King George III as a “petty tyrant.” She called him “unstable” and “consumed with grievance.” She said he’s seeking “unchecked power” and is “obsessed with revenge.”

In short, after a 100-day campaign, Harris is still running as she did when she quickly seized the nomination, as the anti-Trump.

Now, such rhetorical assaults can be traced to the dawn of the republic. You may not love me, but that other guy is so much worse.

That’s why she used the White House as a backdrop, standing at the spot where Trump gave his speech on Jan. 6, 2021 urging his supporters to go to the Capitol, where many proceeded to riot.

Fine. Fair game. Especially for a candidate who’s trying to win some Republican votes, aided by Liz Cheney, a number of former Trump officials and, as of yesterday, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But then the veep tried to make the pivot, presenting herself as the candidate of unity.

And therein lies the fatal flaw. You can’t beat the crap out of your opponent and, in practically the next breath, say you want to bring the country together. You can’t have it both ways. You can be an attack dog, but if you’re baring those teeth, you can’t suddenly be purring like a puppy.

Not that Harris didn’t have some good lines. Trump has an enemies list and she’ll have a to-do list. And of political opponents: “He wants to put them in jail. I’ll give them a seat at my table.”

The segue: “It is time to stop pointing fingers and start locking arms.”

But, um, she just spent a good chunk of her speech pointing fingers.

And then she kept circling back to Trump in the second half, such as when discussing abortion rights.

Harris also went beyond political exaggeration. “He tried to cut Medicare and Social Security every year he was president,” she said. That is simply not true. But she gets very little fact-checking.

Overall, the speech was a plus for her, despite its clashing ideas. But make no mistake, she’s running as the alternative to a man she paints as dangerous.

As the Free Press put it: “This campaign is and always has been all about Trump. And it will be all about Trump all the way to the finish line now.”

But Harris’ big moment was marred by President Biden – the, ah, previous nominee – to the point where it almost seems like he’s trying to undermine her.

Last week, the president said of his predecessor, “Lock him up.” Harris always says she’ll leave that to the courts.

And now, referring to the racist comic at the Madison Square Garden rally who called Puerto Rico an island of garbage, Biden said: “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.”

The president stumbled for a couple of seconds and added: “His–his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American.”

Boom. Too late. There were instant comparisons to Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” swipe at Trump supporters in 2016.

Biden posted a clarification, saying he was referring only to comic Tony Hinchcliffe. (Trump says he doesn’t know the performer and didn’t hear the so-called joke.) 

The White House put out a transcript that included an apostrophe, as in “his supporter’s,” trying to indicate that he was talking about one person. Who would have thought the campaign would turn on a lowly apostrophe? 

A reporter asked Harris about the Biden blunder yesterday before she boarded Air Force Two.

“He clarified his comments, but let me be clear: I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for…I believe the work that I do is about representing people whether they support me or not.”

Harris finally broke with the boss, wisely distancing herself from the blunder. No wonder she’s resisted his suggestion that they campaign together. He’s doing enough damage on his own, with some pundits even suggesting it’s deliberate. 

And that gave Trump an opening: “Now, on top of everything, Joe Biden calls our supporters ‘garbage.’ You can’t lead America if you don’t love the American people.”

It’s a distraction that Kamala Harris didn’t need in the final days of the campaign.

Original article source: The fatal flaw in Kamala Harris’ speech, marred by Biden’s ‘garbage’ comment

****

Once she is elected she will do a BAIT AND SWITCH and do the following:

KOMMONSENTSJANE – What Kamala’s “UNBURDENED” Phrase Really Means: The Radical Agenda Exposed.

Posted on October 28, 2024 by kommonsentsjane

10/28/2024

We must not underestimate her rhetoric or the impact it could have on those who are already radicalized. It’s time to wake up to the truth behind Kamala’s favorite phrase and what it really signals for the future of America.

https://redrightupdates.com/what-kamalas-unburdened-phrase-really-means-the-radical-agenda-exposed/embed/#?secret=e6I9pcd3U5#?secret=rN4uCMJZyJ

ttps://redrightupdates.com/what-kamalas-unburdened-phrase-really-means-the-radical-agenda-exposed/?email=robjoy87%40windstream.net&ptn=29&source=BEC2P&r=false

• Daily
• Posted byby Jimmy Parker

Kamala Harris loves repeating one phrase—over and over—as if she’s discovered the secret to life itself: “Imagine what can be, unburdened by what has been.” At first glance, it’s easy to dismiss this as another example of Kamala’s garbled “word salad” speeches. But there’s something more sinister beneath the surface—this isn’t just a random collection of words meant to sound profound. No, this is a calculated dog whistle, cloaked in progressive ideals, designed to signal her true, radical intentions.

What the Phrase Really Means: Unpacking the Leftist Dog Whistle

Let’s start by dissecting the phrase itself. “Imagine what can be…” sounds hopeful at first, right? It’s a call to envision a bright, limitless future. But then comes the kicker: “…unburdened by what has been.” Here’s where the danger lies—Kamala isn’t talking about removing past mistakes to move forward; she’s talking about erasing history.

It’s straight out of the playbook of Marxist revolutionaries. Think about it: every attempt at reshaping society into a so-called “utopia” has required the eradication of history, traditions, and culture—all in the name of starting over. From the brutal purges under Mao in China to Pol Pot’s violent “Year Zero” campaign in Cambodia, the goal has always been the same: wipe out the past to control the future. Kamala’s phrase is a dog whistle to those who see America’s foundational values as obstacles to be destroyed, not preserved. This is how radical change is justified—by presenting history itself as a burden rather than a foundation.

Why Kamala’s Rhetoric Matters: It’s More Than Just Stupidity

Kamala’s repeated use of this phrase is infuriating for a reason: it’s not just empty rhetoric—it’s intentional propaganda. And that’s why we can’t afford to simply write her off as dumb or ill-prepared. Kamala Harris’s words might seem ridiculous on the surface, but their underlying message is cunning. This is an attempt to galvanize her base, especially the radical left that sees America’s history as inherently evil.

Kamala’s dog whistle isn’t meant for the average American—it’s designed for those who are deeply committed to a radical transformation of America’s core. To them, her phrase is a call to erase everything that came before—to rip out the roots of American exceptionalism in the name of “equity” and “social justice.” This isn’t progress; it’s a revolutionary agenda hiding in plain sight.

The Reality Behind the ‘Unburdened’ Phrase: A Call for Cultural Erasure

When Kamala talks about imagining what can be “unburdened by what has been,” she’s not promoting progress—she’s promoting cultural erasure. The unburdening she speaks of isn’t just about eliminating oppression; it’s about dismantling everything that defines America as it currently stands:

• Free speech? That’s a burden.
• Second Amendment rights? Another burden.
• Traditional family values? Yet another burden.

To Kamala and her ilk, these foundational principles aren’t virtues to be cherished—they’re shackles to be broken. But make no mistake: this vision of “progress” doesn’t lead to a utopia. It leads to chaos and authoritarian control, as history has repeatedly shown.

Why Kamala’s Phrase Should Worry Every American

Kamala Harris isn’t just stumbling through speeches, bumbling her way from one gaffe to the next. This phrase is carefully crafted, and its repetition is strategic. She’s dog-whistling to a very specific audience—those who believe in fundamentally transforming America by obliterating its past. It’s the same tactic we’ve seen throughout history, from Marxists to modern leftists: disguise your true intentions behind vague but “inspirational” language. The mainstream media may call it “visionary,” but conservatives should call it what it really is: a warning sign.

Kamala’s vision of “unburdening” isn’t just empty talk. It’s a coded message to radicalize the left and push America further down the path of socialist-style upheaval. It’s a veiled threat against the very foundations of our republic—against the Constitution, against freedom, and against everything that has made America great.

Final Thoughts

It’s easy to laugh off Kamala Harris as uninformed or out of her depth. But her repeated use of this phrase should be seen for what it is: a call to erase America’s heritage in the name of a new, radical order. It’s not merely incompetence—it’s a calculated move to pave the way for a revolution that tears down what the left views as “burdensome” history.

Again – we must not underestimate her rhetoric or the impact it could have on those who are already radicalized. It’s time to wake up to the truth behind Kamala’s favorite phrase and what it really signals for the future of America.

****

All of the above smells like “you can’t trust her” because she lies.

kommonsentsjane