KOMMONSENTSJANE – Trump Wins Big in Appellate Case Against His Niece.

10/24/2024

ttps://news.spreely.com/trump-wins-big-in-appellate-case-against-his-niece/

Trump Wins Big In Appellate Case Against HIs Niece


Donald Trump, the ex-president, has achieved a win in the New York Court of Appeals in a case unrelated to his hush money ruling.

This comes on the heels of being convicted of 34 charges linked to falsifying business records concerning a non-disclosure agreement payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

On the same day, the appeals court announced its decision to permit him to sue his niece, Mary Trump, for divulging tax-related details to The New York Times in 2018. This was reported by Reuters.

“The Appellate Division in Manhattan found a ‘substantial’ legal basis for Donald Trump to claim that his niece violated confidentiality provisions of a 2001 settlement over the estate of his father, Fred Trump Sr.,” the report said.

“A five-judge panel said it was unclear whether Mary Trump’s disclosures were subject to confidentiality, or how long both sides intended the provisions to remain in effect,” it said.

However, the court did signal that the former president is unlikely to be awarded anything close to the $100 million he is seeking.

“At a minimum, nominal damages may still be available on the breach of contract claim even in the absence of actual damages,” the court said.

“Mary has made valuable contributions to the public’s knowledge of the former president with her unique perspective as a family member,” the attorney for Mary Trump, Anne Champion, said. “We are confident she will be vindicated as the case proceeds.”

“The Appellate Division has affirmed the validity of President Trump’s substantial claim against Mary Trump. We look forward to resuming this suit to ensure she is held fully accountable for her blatant and egregious breach of contract,” the former president’s attorney, Alina Habba, said.

Reuters reported:

Thursday’s decision upheld a June 2023 ruling by Justice Robert Reed of the state Supreme Court.

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-7511718651466925&output=html&h=280&slotname=8482341276&adk=1990904547&adf=1194478242&pi=t.ma~as.8482341276&w=951&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1729738138&rafmt=1&format=951×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.spreely.com%2Ftrump-wins-big-in-appellate-case-against-his-

Reed also dismissed Donald Trump’s claims against the Times and three reporters, and in January ordered him to pay $392,639 of their legal fees.

In November 2022, Reed dismissed Mary Trump’s separate lawsuit accusing her uncle and two of his siblings of defrauding her out of a multi-million-dollar inheritance.

The Times’ reporting challenged Donald Trump’s claim that he was a self-made billionaire.

It said he received the equivalent of $413 million from his father, largely the result of “dubious” tax schemes in the 1990s, including undervaluing his family’s real estate holdings. Donald Trump has denied wrongdoing.

Many legal experts have expressed confidence that the former president has a strong likelihood of having his convictions overturned on appeal in his criminal case.

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley commented on the guilty verdict of former President Donald Trump in his hush money trial, stating that there are strong reasons for a reversal based on procedural and constitutional issues.

Speaking to Fox News outside the Manhattan courtroom, Turley emphasized that there were concerns about manufactured charges and potential unconstitutional hindrances to Trump’s defense by presiding Judge Juan Merchan.

The jury’s decision marked the first felony conviction of a former U.S. president.

“I think the level of reversible error here really is quite considerable. It runs the waterfront of procedural to constitutional problems, including federal constitutional violations,” Turley began. “I don’t even see how you can meet the unanimity requirement in the way that this thing was instructed.

“Yeah, they were unanimous that some crime was committed on the secondary crime, but it’s apparently between the jurors and God as to what that crime was unless there is going to be some release of a jury form. We have not seen that jury form,” he continued, referencing a document that could explain on what basis jurors found Trump guilty.

“I think that, in the end, we were going to have a reversal. I’m fairly confident of that. Now, in the New York appellate system, they have a rule for Trump. They are very good lawyers in the New York system and credible people who want the system to work the way it is designed,” Turley continued. “I am eternally an optimist. I was an optimist about a hung jury. And I’m an optimist now about the appellate judges.”

kommonsentsjane

Unknown's avatar

About kommonsentsjane

Enjoys sports and all kinds of music, especially dance music. Playing the keyboard and piano are favorites. Family and friends are very important.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment