8/27/2024

THIS IS HUGE!

It calls everything into play since that time.

With everything he has admitted here, Zuckerberg, is responsible for all of the damage he has caused to each person and the country which is now heavily in debt from keeping President Trump out of office and at this point the Democrats turning to Marxism. None of this would have happened if President Trump had been office.

Look how the left cheated in the election – what does he say about that and the system failure that rigged the numbers that night. Just a slap on the wrist is not going to correct what the media/tech have been doing to this country BY COLLUDING WITH THE DEMOCRATS/FBI/CIA/ETC.

He and the other rest of the media should all be brought in front of Congress and made to testify as to what they know about this. All of them should be heavily fined.

It has caused a lot of problem between the two political factions – especially, how Biden/Kamala have treated the conservatives since 2020. A smart aleck attitude like “we know something you don’t” – which was very evident even to this day.

Look at the weaponization of the entire government which had colluding under their belt. Pelosi/Obama threatening President Biden to resign – that is not par for the Constitution.

More has to come out of this. This is just the tip of the ice berg called 2020.

*****

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg openly admits he regrets colluding to censor political information

Follow America’s fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

In a letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee chair Jim Jordan, Zuckerberg highlighted the undue influence exerted by the government to remove certain content, including humor and satire. This admission shines a light on the challenges of maintaining free speech in an era where government overreach is increasingly encroaching on private enterprises and public discourse.

Zuckerberg’s letter details how Meta removed certain materials from its platforms in 2021 following directives from senior government officials. While the Biden administration has defended its actions as necessary to protect public health and safety, Zuckerberg’s revelations suggest a troubling trend of governmental overreach. The government’s push to suppress dissenting voices, even those using satire or humor to express their views, is a clear violation of free speech rights. This type of censorship sets a dangerous precedent for the suppression of opposing viewpoints under the guise of public safety.

The Biden administration’s justification for these actions—encouraging “responsible actions to protect public health”—raises serious concerns about the balance between public safety and the fundamental rights enshrined in the First Amendment. If satire and humor are deemed dangerous enough to censor, where does this lead us in terms of other forms of expression?

Zuckerberg’s letter also revisits the controversial handling of content related to Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son, during the 2020 presidential election. In a move that now appears to have been an overreach, Meta briefly demoted posts about Hunter Biden following warnings from the FBI about a possible Russian disinformation campaign. However, Zuckerberg now acknowledges that the suppression of this story was a mistake, as it was later confirmed not to be part of any disinformation operation.

The Hunter Biden laptop story, which involved emails suggesting potential influence on U.S. foreign policy while Joe Biden was Vice President, became a significant talking point for conservatives. Social media platforms’ decision to censor the story under the pretext of it being potential disinformation only fueled accusations of bias and interference in the election process. Zuckerberg’s admission that the story should not have been suppressed is a notable vindication for conservative voices who felt marginalized by the arbitrary content moderation policies.

Zuckerberg’s letter reveals that Meta has since revised its content moderation policies to avoid similar mistakes in the future. The tech giant now pledges to “push back” against any attempts at government interference that seeks to suppress free speech and manipulate public opinion. This shift represents a significant win for proponents of free speech, especially those on the conservative side who have long argued that big tech companies disproportionately target their viewpoints.

Zuckerberg’s commitment to avoiding further contributions to electoral infrastructure, such as the $400 million he donated in 2020 to support election offices during the pandemic, also indicates a desire to distance Meta from political controversy. The funds, distributed through his philanthropic organization, were intended to be non-partisan. However, accusations of favoritism and attempts to influence the election process have made Zuckerberg wary of repeating this contribution in future election cycles.

Ex Navy Seal and Ex Cop break down Trump Assassination Attempt

The conservative stance on free speech has consistently been that all voices, regardless of political alignment, deserve a platform. Zuckerberg’s admission that Meta yielded to government pressure to censor content goes against this principle, but his current commitment to resisting such pressure in the future is a step in the right direction. It is an acknowledgment of the mistakes made and a pledge to uphold the values of free speech and open dialogue moving forward.

As we move into an era where digital platforms hold immense power over public discourse, the need for vigilance against government overreach and biased censorship becomes more critical. Zuckerberg’s promise to push back against future attempts at government interference sets a precedent for other tech companies to follow. It reinforces the importance of maintaining a space where all ideas can be shared and debated without fear of unjust suppression.

For conservatives, this is not just a victory but a rallying call to continue advocating for free speech and holding big tech accountable. The fight for an open and fair digital public square is far from over, but Zuckerberg’s recent statements provide hope that the tide may be turning in favor of transparency, fairness, and the protection of fundamental rights.

****

Not, so fast – what about the 2020 election and the impact this had on it?

Our country has been put in this position by evil doers.

kommonsentsjane