01/03/2024
President Trump’s follows the U.S. Constitution and Biden’s DOES NOT FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION AND follows fascism which is you make up the rules as you go.
Where is the Supreme Court?
Biden/Obama are not following the Constitution which states the government must provide protection from foreign invasion and domestic violence to all states..
Governor Abbott has the right to protect the state from foreign invasion since Biden/Obama are committing treason by creating an association with Soros/open borders/one world order to create chaos in our country.
******
ttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65574725
How Joe Biden and Donald Trump’s border policies compare
17th May 2023, 12:31 CDTShare
By Bernd Debusmann JrBBC News, Washington DC
Getty ImagesThe Biden administration has long vowed to take a more ‘humane’ approach to US immigration policy.
Just after taking office, US President Joe Biden vowed to put an end to what he termed the “moral and ethical” shame of Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
The Trump administration had adopted a strict border policy and the Biden White House promised a more “humane” approach.
But the Democratic president has faced criticism from immigration advocates who say his policies are unduly harsh.
Here’s how the two US presidents compare.
Sending migrants back
What Trump did: In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Trump administration invoked Title 42, a controversial statute ostensibly meant as a public health measure.
The policy allowed US authorities to swiftly expel migrants – including asylum seekers – at the border.
Nearly 400,000 people were detained and expelled between its implementation and January 2021, when Mr Trump left the White House.
Even at the height of the pandemic, Title 42 came under frequent criticism from those who argued the policy allowed the US to expel asylum seekers without any legal process.
Human Rights Watch, for example, said the policy was “illegal and violates the human rights of those subjected to it”.
What Biden did: He defended keeping Title 42 in place, using the pandemic as justification.
Over 2.28 million people were expelled using Title 42 authority between January 2021 and March 2023, the last month for which data is available.
But when the US ended its coronavirus public health emergency on May 11, Title 42 expired with it.
To replace it, US immigration authorities unveiled a “carrot and stick” approach that encourages legal pathways, while also implementing strict penalties for those who cross illegally.
They have opened regional processing centres in Latin America aimed at helping migrants apply to come to the US and expanded access to CBP One, an app migrants can use to schedule asylum appointments.People who cross illegally will be deported, barred from re-entering the US for at least five years, and be “presumed ineligible for asylum”, according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Under Title 42, there were no such consequences.
Republicans have said they fear the policies won’t do enough to stop an influx of migrants.
Some Democrats, as well as some immigration advocates, claim the policies implemented after Title 42 also violate international refugee law.
1:03Migrant mother tells children: ‘We’re on a quest to find the treasure’
Making migrants stay in Mexico
What Trump did: In January 2019, the Trump administration implemented a policy – officially known as Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP – that forced asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their US immigration hearings.
About 70,000 people were returned to Mexico under the policy. They were often left there for months at a time and sometimes preyed upon by criminal gangs.
Human Rights First, a charity organisation, estimated that more than 1,500 migrants were kidnapped, raped or abused after being returned to Mexico.
Mr Biden called the policy “inhumane”.
What Biden did: The administration moved to suspend Remain in Mexico on Mr Biden’s first day in the White House in January 2021. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moved to officially terminate the policy in June the same year.
But a ruling by a Trump-appointed federal court judge in Texas found that the administration had improperly cancelled the policy. It was restarted in December 2021.
In June 2022, the US Supreme Court sided with the Biden administration, ruling it didn’t violate proper administrative procedure in rescinding Remain in Mexico. The ruling allowed the policy to be terminated.
Getty Images
Separating families
What Trump did: Under Mr Trump, the US government had a “zero-tolerance” policy that allowed US authorities to deport adults who crossed the border illegally.
In some cases parents were deported back to their home countries without their children, who were placed in government custody.
Mr Trump repeatedly defended – and continues to defend – the policy as a way to deter would-be migrants.
At least 3,900 children were separated from their parents between 2017 and 2021.
What Biden did: Mr Biden reversed the practice and some families – but not all – have been reunited.
While a task force has reunited most families, as of March nearly 1,000 children are still separated from their parents, government statistics show.
In December 2021, the administration also moved to stop holding families in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention.
In a separate but related recent policy, the Biden administration announced it would let in 100,000 migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and Colombia who have family in the US.
Details on the programme remain scant, but the US has said that requests will be handled by the new regional processing hubs. Those approved will receive travel authorisation before heading to the US.
Once there, they will be eligible to apply for work permits while they await immigrant visas. More details on the programme are expected to be announced in June.
****
KOMMONSENTSJANE – INTERNET AGREES WITH FOX NEWS LAURA INGRAHAM AS SHE SLAMS BIDEN “REGIME” FOR THREATENING TO SUE TEXAS OVER BILL TO DEPORT MIGRANTS.
Posted on December 30, 2023 by kommonsentsjane
12/30/2023
Where is the Supreme Court?
Biden/Obama are not following the Constitution which states the government must provide protection from foreign invasion and domestic violence to all states..
Governor Abbott has the right to protect the state from foreign invasion since Biden/Obama are committing treason by creating an association with Soros/open borders/one world order to create chaos in our country.
Plain and simple.
*****
Article IV Section IV
The Guarantee Clause requires the United States to guarantee to the states a republican form of government, and provide protection from foreign invasion and domestic violence. Although rarely formally invoked by Congress, the President, or the courts, there is some consensus on what it means.
At its core, the Guarantee Clause provides for majority rule. A republican government is one in which the people govern through elections. This is the constant refrain of the Federalist Papers. Alexander Hamilton, for example, put it this way in The Federalist No. 57: “The elective mode of obtaining rulers is the characteristic policy of republican government.”
*****
ttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/internet-agrees-with-fox-news-laura-ingraham-as-she-slams-biden-regime-for-threatening-to-sue-texas-over-bill-to-deport-migrants/ar-AA1megp6
Internet agrees with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham as she slams ‘Biden Regime’ for threatening to sue Texas over bill to deport migrants© Provided by Meaww
NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: On Thursday, December 28, in a letter to Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, the Biden administration threatened legal action if the state enforces a recently enacted law that grants authorities the power to arrest, jail, prosecute, and deport migrants who enter the country illegally
Following this news, Fox News host Laura Ingraham took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to slam the administration, labeling it the “Biden Regime.”
Many users on X agreed with Ingraham’s remarks and expressed their opinion on the issue, slamming the Biden administration in the process.
Laura Ingraham slams Biden administration over border crisis
Fox News host Laura Ingraham took to X and wrote, “The Biden Regime will fight anyone who slows down the incoming flow because the goal is to completely transform America.”
Ingraham’s tweet also linked an article from the New York Post titled, ‘Biden admin threatens to sue Texas if state arrests and deport migrants.’
In the article, it was reported that the Biden admin has issued a warning to Texas Governor Greg Abbott that they “intend to file suit” against the state if they try to arrest, jail, prosecute, or deport migrants.
Related video: Laura Ingraham on Maine barring Trump from ballot: This is voter suppression (FOX News)
(Did you know that China owns Ben/Jerry’s?)*****
*****
Going to bring in Laura Ingraham is joining us on
Laura Ingraham on Maine barring Trump from ballot: This is voter suppression
In a letter sent to Abbott, a Justice Department official asserted that the recently enacted law, known as SB4 or Senate Bill 4, is “contrary to the US commitment of ensuring the processing of noncitizens consistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act.”
This law is a component of the state’s Operation Lone Star, launched by Governor Abbott in March 2021, and is scheduled to take effect on March 5, 2024.
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M Boynton wrote, “SB 4 is preempted and violates the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the United States intends to file suit to enjoin the enforcement of SB 4 unless Texas agrees to refrain from enforcing the law,” as reported by CBS News.
SB 4, signed into law by Abbott on December 18, criminalizes illegal entry into the United States from Mexico as a state offense.
Additionally, it grants authorization for police to arrest individuals suspected of crossing the Rio Grande between designated ports of entry.
Under SB 4, migrants apprehended for illegal entry into the country would face a Class B misdemeanor charge, which carries a potential sentence of up to six months in jail.
Repeat offenders could be charged with a second-degree felony, carrying a maximum prison sentence of up to 20 years.
The law also empowers Texas judges to dismiss charges against migrants if they agree to be deported.
Justice Department official Boynton argues that this new law “intrudes into a field that the federal government occupies.”
He added, “Indeed, the Supreme Court has confirmed that ‘the removal process’ must be ‘entrusted to the discretion of the Federal Government’ because a ‘decision on removability’ touches ‘on foreign relations and must be made with one voice.’”
The DOJ official highlighted a concern that SB 4 might result in the imprisonment or deportation of migrants with valid asylum claims, exposing them to the risk of persecution or torture in their home countries.
The Biden administration has requested Abbott to confirm by January 3 that he will not enforce the new law, stating that if they do not, “the United States will pursue all appropriate legal remedies to ensure that Texas does not interfere with the functions of the federal government.”
In response, Abbott criticized the threat on social media, accusing Joe Biden of “destroying America” and expressing frustration with what he perceives to be the administration’s reluctance to enforce existing immigration laws.
Abbott wrote, “The Biden Admin. not only refuses to enforce current U.S. immigration laws, they now want to stop Texas from enforcing laws against illegal immigration. I’ve never seen such hostility to the rule of law in America. Biden is destroying America. Texas is trying to save it.”
*****
Internet backs Laura Ingraham’s remarks against Biden admin
Many X users took a brutal jibe at Joe Biden and his “regime” after Laura Ingraham shared the news on the DOJ official’s warning to Texas.
One person wrote, “Biden and crew are out to destroy our Republic,” and another added, “Sue back for Biden neglecting his Oath to the Constitution.”
An X user slammed the Biden admin as they wrote, “The Biden administration has done everything that they can to destroy this country. I mean everything bad that they could do, they’ve done. I don’t understand how a president could hate this country so much. I think treason is what he should be charged with.”
One more user expressed a similar thought, claiming, “Biden needs to be charged with TREASON!!!” and another added, “When has the calculus of the Dems ever been right.”
Another wrote, “Not “transform”, “destroy”!”
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.
kommonsentsjane 