For documentation purposes – Google terrorists interfered with this blog.
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents
https://iowaclimate.org/2020/03/13/biofuels/
DAILY NEWS13 Mar 2020
Biofuels
By Andy MayFrom a common sense point of view! Don’t you know the scientists will laugh when they read my common point of view.
From reading this article sh** is a good thing, after all, and is being turned into something useful.
So, since pollution is the problem, instead of releasing pollution to the atmosphere – why can’t they catch it and recycle it back into something useful? Isn’t natural gas a vapor which is extracted and the good stuff removed and put to use as a liquid? I know, it is all about money; but, look how much money is being spent to make biofuels?
kommonsentsjane
Iowa Climate Science Education
By Andy May
According to Exxon-Mobil, 9% of the world?s energy came from biofuels in 2017. They do not expect this percentage to increase by 2040, and it may go down. For the most part it is a developing world fuel. Primary biofuels include dung, wood, wood chips and pellets. Secondary, or manufactured biofuels include ethanol and biodiesel, which derive from several agricultural products, mainly corn, sugar cane, palm oil, soybeans and canola. The main advantage of using locally sourced wood and dung are their low cost and wide availability. Using imported wood or wood chips for generating electricity, as is done in Europe, is more problematic. Due to the economic and environmental costs of farming the trees, making the wood pellets or chips and shipping them to the powerplants; wood is not a competitive fuel for most powerplants. The energy density is too low. However, if the source…
View original post 4,787 more words