The Google terrorists are at work with this blog.  It is time for the President to check out these terrorists because they are working against the people in the U.S.

President Trump is trying to save our country from Obama’s Pelosi Democrats – Obama is trying to turn it over to Iran/Muslims as we all know.   Pelosi is using sharia law not the Constitution – you are guilty until you are proven innocent versus the Constitution which states – YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY with a FAKE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS.

See following:  KOMMONSENTSJANE – ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT DO NOT MEET THE CONSTITUTION’S CRITERIA

Nancy Pelosi’s donkey show seemed to caused some consternation among the Democrats who had left their porn site on to run into the room to “get their pen.”   Some even stated:

Nancy Pelosi uses too many pens.

The pen cost is a drop in the bucket compared to what Obama and the Pelosi Democrats gave to Iran in cash through our Treasury which needs to reveal who, what, and when?

If you are not terrified by the conduct of the House majority, you are not paying attention. This is precisely what the founders warned us of.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi said the following: ”He just got impeached. He’ll be impeached forever. No matter what the Senate does. He’s impeached forever because he violated our Constitution.”

ONE SICK BITCH:

That is not anywhere unanimous and as we go forward with the many investigations that John Durham is looking into, whether or not the word “impeached” by a thin margin of radical socialists will mean anything at all, is highly doubtful.

Pelosi’s hormones were raging today!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/pelosi-crows-trump-will-be-impeached-forever

******

January 16, 2020

The House speaker sparked the  ire on Wednesday when she used a remarkable number of writing implements – more than three trays littered with them – to sign her name on the articles of impeachment against Donald Trump.

The pens, engraved with her signature, were intended as souvenirs for Pelosi’s allies. She carefully signed the documents, apparently stroke by stroke, using different pens for each portion of her signature. Then she distributed them to impeachment managers and committee members.

First  piece of cake on a table?

“The truth comes out. This isn’t ‘somber’ or ‘serious’ for @HouseDemocrats,” the House Republicans tweeted, referring to Democrats’ description of the impeachment process. “This has been partisan since day one.”

“They claim it’s a somber, serious occasion they’re heartbroken over … and then they pass out impeachment-signing pens with special cases. Folks. You can’t make it up,” wrote the North Carolina Republican representative Mark Meadows. The House Republican whip, Steve Scalise, called the moment “unbelievable”. And Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary, sarcastically suggested Pelosi “was so somber as she gave them away to people like prizes”.

Pens, engraved with Nancy Pelosi’s signature, are neatly arranged on a silver tray for the engrossment ceremony of the articles of impeachment against Donald Trump.

Barack Obama used 22 pens to sign his landmark healthcare law.

Lyndon Johnson is said to have used 75 to sign the Civil Rights Act.

The tradition goes back to at least Franklin Roosevelt, as Time explained in 2010: “The pen used to sign legislation itself becomes a historical artifact. The more pens a president uses, the more thank-you gifts he can offer to those who helped create that piece of history.”

In fact, as Guardian political reporter Lauren Gambino pointed out, commemorative pens were used in a very analogous situation in the late 1990s: the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

In that case, senators who signed a pledge to be impartial received pens that accidentally dubbed them “Untied States senators”.

Alongside Republican anger, Wednesday’s episode of Too-Many-Pens-gate sparked much amusement on Twitter:

As it turns out the delay in sending over the Articles of Impeachment wasn’t politically motivated.@SpeakerPelosi had to wait for her monogrammed pens from Etsy. https://t.co/J1Jy3sgSFK
— Kevin Dalton (@NextLAMayor) January 15, 2020

I have never seen so many adults triggered by a photo of some ballpoint pens.  They now call the Pelosi area of signing – THE HOUSE OF HORRORS.

******

Pelosi’s Impeachment Blunder

David Harsanyi
,
National Review

•January 09, 2020

We are in the midst of an imaginary impeachment standoff between House speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell. “Both have drawn firm lines in the sand. Someone’s got to give,” one reporter recently declared.

There is, of course, nothing to “give.” Pelosi has no standing to dictate the terms of a Senate trial; no constitutional right or political leverage. Why she has put herself in a position that will ultimately end, one way or another, with her surrendering to McConnell is perplexing.

A new piece in Time magazine does shed some light on the thought process behind Pelosi’s decision to refuse to hand over articles of impeachment to a Senate whose majority doesn’t want them.

One of the most interesting nuggets in the piece isn’t that Pelosi — portrayed as courageous risk-taker — had gotten the bright idea from CNN; it’s that she specifically got it from noted felon John Dean, Nixon’s former White House lawyer. Now, Dean is often portrayed as a patriotic, whistle-blowing impeachment expert — which is true insofar as he planned the Watergate coverup, and then informed on everyone whom he conspired with after they were caught. His real expertise is cashing in on criminality for the past 50 years (I wrote about Dean’s slimy past here).

Surely Pelosi, blessed with preternatural political instincts, wouldn’t rely on Dean’s advice? Surely Pelosi wasn’t browbeaten into doing this by podcast bros and talking heads on America’s least popular major cable-news network?

Because whatever you make of the case against Donald Trump, it’s getting increasingly difficult to argue that this amateurish, constantly shifting effort by the House has been effective. After two dramatic emergency impeachment hearings, a pretend standoff, and massive cooperative coverage from the media, poll numbers haven’t budged. They may even have ticked back toward Donald Trump.

Yet, to hear Time tell it, Pelosi has micromanaged every step of this process, from signing off on every committee report and press release — “aides say she caught typos in the Intelligence Committee’s final report before it went out“ — to picking furniture that would make Adam Schiff and the more diminutive Jerry Nadler look like equals.

My working theory is this: Pelosi realized that impeachment was a mistake. She didn’t want the president to be able tell voters that he had been exonerated by Senate. The only way to mitigate the damage was to undertake a ham-fisted effort to attack the Senate trial and dampen, or perhaps circumvent, that inevitable moment.

In the process, however, Pelosi destroyed the Democrats’ justification for rushing impeachment in the first place. Nadler and Schiff both argued that Trump’s tenure in office constituted a national emergency, and that the only way to save the republic from another stolen election was to move quickly.

McConnell, on the other hand, had to take only a short break from confirming judges to inform the House that the Senate would treat the impeachment of Donald Trump the same way it treated the impeachment of Bill Clinton — with a rules package that passed 100–0 in 1998. Under the Clinton precedent, the Senate would allow both the House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers to make their case, with questions from the Senate to follow.

Pelosi’s defenders are running out of arguments. Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin now says that acting on the Clinton precedent means that moderate Republican senators such as Susan Collins “will face the real possibility that conclusive evidence of Trump’s wrongdoing will come to light after a sham trial. That would make for a disastrous, humiliating legacy.”

The gaping hole in this argument, and the reason Democrats are losing the debate, is that they’ve already claimed to have conclusive evidence of Trump’s wrongdoing. They claimed they had proof of bribery, but they didn’t include it in the impeachment articles. They claimed to have proof in the Mueller report that Trump obstructed justice, yet it’s not in the article of impeachments either. Rubin herself has alleged, dozens of times, that we already have definitive proof Trump has committed an impeachable offense.

In truth, if the House had made a persuasive case, there would be public pressure on Republicans to act in a different manner. That the House did not is the only reason Pelosi embraced John Dean’s silly idea — which has drastically backfired.

*******

As a woman and a Catholic – Pelosi is a disgrace to women in pubic (GOOGLE’S WORD NOT MINE) public positions and using her religion as a “needle in the haystack.”  And, why is that – because of her raging hormones.

kommonsentsjane