This is a good example of two liberals, Chris Wallace and the writer of this article, ELLEN,” piling on a person, Harris Faulkner, who doesn’t agree with them. Why not have a civil conversation and accept the fact that you don’t agree with each other.

***************

Watch Chris Wallace Smack Down A Fox Host’s Ridiculous Attempts To Claim Trump Has Been Tough On Russia

Posted by Ellen

NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don’t have to!

on March 15, 2018

Fox host and blatant Trumper Harris Faulkner tried to use today’s announcement of U.S. sanctions against Russia to claim that Donald Trump has been tough on Russia all along. It didn’t go well.

I must admit that Faulkner’s efforts made me suspicious that Trump TV is working to play up Trump as anti-Russia just as he’s about to deliver a potentially fatal blow to the Mueller investigation.

Today, the New York Times reported that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has subpoenaed Trump Organization documents, including some related to Russia, in “the first known instance of the special counsel demanding records directly related to President Trump’s businesses” and “bringing the investigation closer to the president.”

(The information stated it is the tax return for 1995 and this is 2018 – that is 23 years ago. The return was approved at that time. So how can one person (Mueller) decide at this date that he wants to reverse the decision.

I think Mueller has gotten to the end of the rope and there is no where to go except out the door. If this is used to make an issue – then our country is in trouble even more than I thought. I know IRS Lois Lerner strung up some people and did not receive any punishment – this is harassment.)

At the same time, there are ominous signs that Trump and his stooge, Devin Nunes, may be on the brink of destroying the Russia investigation, or at least taking some dangerous whacks.

But it’s quite possible that Trump-devotee Faulkner independently came up with her ridiculous Russia spin just to make Dear Leader look good.

(Just look at the hate.)

Whatever her motivation, Chris Wallace was not a party to the effort.
Faulkner began by saying she “had a Brain Room look at some of the things that this administration has done with regard to Russia.” After reading some of Trump’s supposed actions against Russia, she “asked” if it was “fair for critics to look at this president and say he’s done nothing with regard to Russia?”

“It’s not fair to say he’s done nothing,” Wallace replied, “but I think there is legitimate criticism that he could have done more.”
Faulkner interrupted. Sounding testy, she said, “I have a longer list but we only have so much time.”

Sadly for Faulkner, Wallace was not deterred. He pointed out that the sanctions enacted today were “passed by Congress overwhelmingly” in July. That “raises the question what took him so long to do it?” Wallace continued.

(How many years have those congressmen/women been in office and have been working on these sanctions – they probably had then prepared during Obama’s rein but couldn’t get them passed – because of the love fest gong on between Obama/Putin – how long has the Prez been in office.)

Wallace went on to note that others in the Trump administration are tougher on Russia than he is. “There’s always a kind of equivocation” whenever Trump discusses Russia, Wallace said. “He’s not definite, he doesn’t condemn and that’s notable.”

(Remember Hillary’s reset button that didn’t work and Obama relating to Medvedev to tell Putin – he could do more after he was re-elected – does that sound tough? Sounds like a love fest.)

Unable to refute that, and with a hint of pique in her voice,

Faulkner moved on to suggest that Trump’s softness on Russia is because “he is a negotiator” and “might want to leave the door open.”
“He potentially could sit down with Kim Jong-un,” Faulkner said. Now she sounded admiring. She suggested that Trump was using the same “carrot-and-stick” approach with Russia.

That talking point didn’t work either. “If anything,” Wallace said, Trump’s “very tough rhetoric” toward North Korea’s Kim was “exactly the opposite” of the approach toward Russia.

Wallace went on to point out that Trump had been “very slow to admit that the Russians even meddled in the election,” was “slow to implement the sanctions” and that his rhetoric remained mild even after they were implemented. “And this is a president who has no problem talking tough when he wants to,” Wallace added.

Faulkner was not to be deterred. “Well, we’re gonna need Russia and China to deal with North Korea,” she argued.

However, even Faulkner agreed that Russia’s meddling poses a threat to the 2018 midterm elections.

But Wallace reminded her that Admiral Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, said he has never received any orders to combat the meddling.

(Isn’t it Mike Rogers’ job to give the President recommendations for him to consider in “combating” the meddling?)

“Has the administration done anything to protect us from the same kind of meddling we had in 2016?” Wallace asked. “And the answer is, not really very much.”

(That is true and why – they have been too busy swatting the liberal democrat dark government mosquitoes. Plus, the people who are supposed to be working the problem have been too busy trying to take down the Prez with gotcha’s like Chris Wallace and Mike Rogers trying to make the Prez look bad.)

Faulkner’s response? “Diplomacy experts” have told her the U.K.’s expulsion of Russians in response to the poisoning of a Russian double agent there was “really nothing” whereas “What we’ve done is a stronger position.”

And then… discussion over.

See how determined Faulkner was to spin Trump’s behavior toward Russia below, from the March 15, 2018 Outnumbered Overtime.

Didn’t see anywhere in this article where Ellen had any suggestions to bring to the table.

http://www.foxnews.com/person/f/harris-faulkner.html

03:38
VIDEO 2 days ago
Rep. Walker: New Russian sanctions have teeth, send message
Republican congressman from North Carolina on Trump administration’s sanctions on Russia for election interference, cyberattacks.

kommonsentsjane