This morning, our DCG posted that Hillary Clinton’s losing campaign cost a record $1.2B, which was twice as much as what the Trump campaign spent. So it should come as no surprise that at least some of Hillary’s big donors think their money was wasted — they might as well have set fire to the piles […]
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
Someone in the Democratic party needs to take some lessons from Trump since the Dem’s and their donors did THROW GOOD MONEY AFTER bad money.
The idiom “to throw good money after bad” refers to a situation in which someone appears to be wasting money on a losing proposition WHICH WAS HILLARY CLINTON. Many languages have some version of this idiom, reflecting the fact that wasted money is a universal problem around the world.
As a general rule, people use this term as a form of criticism, suggesting that someone’s decision to keep spending money is ill-advised WHICH WAS VERY EVIDENT IN THIS ELECTION. Just think how much good we could have done with that money if they would have used it to pay the country’s debt.
What and who has this money?
kommonsentsjane
kommonsentsjane 