Originally posted on Ray Hanania Columns: Debate Analysis: Lester Holt took sides in the Trump-Clinton debate, and denied the American people an opportunity to understand the real issues separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Although Clinton claims she won, the truth is she wasn’t as much a factor in the debate as Holt was. And…

via Holt biased in Trump-Clinton debate — Arlin 

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

LESTER HOLT MADE HISTORY – HE DEBATED DONALD TRUMP FOR HILLARY CLINTON WHICH MADE HER PART EASIER.  TWO LIBERALS AGAINST ONE CONSERVATIVE (don’t give me that crap that he is a conservative).

Trump was in reality debating Lester Holt not Hillary Clinton.  Lester Holt, the media, was suppose to guide, witness and report the news – not be a main part of the story and inject himself in the news.  And that my friends is what he did, he made himself the central figure or headline.  Trump and Clinton were only the subtitles.  He definitely needs to have some training on how to handle a debate.

kommonsentsjane