The bull has left; but, the shit is still there.

As was the case in the Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton primary vote – “If you have exit polling data that is significantly off from the vote, then [the election’s] probably hacked.”

This is why Clinton won big over Sanders, plus the special votes that were awarded to  Clinton before the primary ever started – the queen was anointed before the race every started.  Rather than fight the Clinton/Obama  machine, Sanders took his money and ran off to buy a $600,000 lake house to lick his wounds.  In the end it looks like Sanders philosophy is “if you can’t lick ’em – join ’em.”

So all of  you voting precincts better get ready because “you ain’t seen nothing yet – because, in spite of it all, Clinton is not worried because if she can’t win it fair – they will resort to cheating and if it means killing anyone who gets in the way – it will happen.  Their road map has proven that in the past.

kommonsentsjane

***************

Why Is The Most Corrupt Candidate In History Winning Big?

(Because you can always win – if  you pencil whip the other person.)

(In summary, just like the mentioned discrepancies between voting results and exit polls, voter suppression has overwhelmingly damaged Bernie Sanders, leaving Clinton unharmed. Again, one or two could be anomalies, but systemic voter suppression is a distinct indicator of electoral fraud.)

By: Ben Shapiro

August 15, 2016
The most corrupt candidate in the history of the presidency, Hillary Clinton, is cruising toward victory. If the election were held today, she’d win in excess of 360 electoral votes. She’s currently leading in Pennsylvania (+9.2 percent), Michigan (+6.6 percent), Ohio (+2.6 percent), Virginia (+8 percent), New Hampshire (+8.2 percent), Georgia (+0.3 percent), Florida (+3.6 percent), Iowa (+0.4 percent), Wisconsin (+9.4 percent), Colorado (+11 percent), North Carolina (+2 percent), Nevada (+2.3 percent). Trump’s barely ahead in Arizona (+0.3 percent) and Missouri (+5.3 percent).

How in the world is she winning?
In the last three months, the head of the FBI has said she was “extremely careless” with classified material and came whisker-close to indicting her. Every day, new headlines break about the cozy and likely illegal relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department. She’s unlikable, she’s nasty, and she’s boring.

How can she be blowing out anyone, even Donald Trump?

The answer lies in what economist George Gilder might call the “information theory” of politics. Gilder says that the economy runs on new information changing the equilibrium. In essence, there is a steady drone of old information in the economy – and that’s what creates an economic status quo. Both entrepreneurial successes and devastating depressions add new information to the economy, which is why you see movement in the markets.

But old information doesn’t change anything.

This is the problem with Hillary: she doesn’t add any new information to the system. We already knew Hillary was deeply corrupt from her time in the White House. From Whitewater to Chinagate, from Travelgate to leading up the coverup for Bill’s sexual harrassments, Hillary’s corruption has been top of mind for well over two decades.
And her threats to national security have been well known for years, too. In 1996, the Clinton campaign allegedly took Chinese donations in return for declassifying sensitive missile technology, which the Chinese then used for their weaponry. So it’s no surprise to find out that she’d willingly sell access to foreign nations in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation slush fund.

In other words, she’s been so dirty for so long that it’s almost impossible to add new information to the system. All she has to do is continue to be the same old kind of dirty we already knew she was, and she’ll waltz her way to the White House.

Trump promised to expose Hillary to criticism she’d never felt before, but he hasn’t done it. Instead, Trump has provided new information to the system every day. While we’ve known Trump for as long (longer!) than Hillary, we didn’t know him on a political level in any serious way. We knew him as an entertaining business magnate and personal branding specialist. But nobody had any real perspective on his view of disabled reporters and Mexican judges. While Hillary refuses to add any new information to the system, Trump’s adding new information every day. That’s why Hillary’s campaign continues to maintain stability while Trump’s seems to bump up and down, nearly at random.

This means that if Trump wants to win, he’ll have to somehow reverse that polarity. He’ll have to force Hillary off her game – he’ll have to give us new information, a new angle about her. We already knew Hillary was Crooked Hillary; labeling her that doesn’t change the background noise.  We didn’t know that Trump was a volatile as he’s proven to be.

(I do not think that last sentence is true – the media has inflamed every thing called, “Trump.”   Not having been a corrupt politician has caused Trump to make mistakes because he is honest and “tells everything in true fashion” not some prefabricated story that we have heard from the Clinton lying machine.  So if the public wants a liar – then they should vote for Hillary.  Trump is sincere and why would he leave a comfort zone to be fighting these politicians.  Good Lord, look what they have put him through – could you as an individual survived what this man has – NO – look at all of the victims who have fallen by the wayside since the campaign started.)

(If you want someone volatile – just vote for the liar – besides her brain is dieing every day if she has Parkinson’s as has been stated – she can’t even stand up and has to sit down at her rallies – so that tells you – she doesn’t have a leg to stand on with any of her policies because she is just blowing smoke.)

Trump needs to stabilize, of course. And then he needs to punch at Hillary, expose information about her most people don’t know. That’s tougher than it looks. We now live in an era where politicians benefit from surviving years of corruption – it makes them seem stable by comparison with newbies who make lots of mistakes and commit lots of sins. That’s Hillary’s major advantage, even more than the media that licks her boots. And that’s the advantage Trump will have to overcome.

(Yes, Trump will have to overcome and here is hoping we have some divine intervention by the American people waking up and smelling and realizing corruption only dims the hopes of all of us.)

kmmonsentsjane