Hillary pounding Trump to keep people busy with one hand while the other hand is busy raking in the dough.  It is hard to do anything when Huma Abedin has to keep pushing her from place to place with the FBI handlers propping her up and she can’t even think or walk up a flight of seven stairs.  Glory Be!

With the hammering of Trump by the Communist news media in the U.S. and the Elite Repub’s  and Clinton going negative with Trump, they think it is working; but, where it shows is – CNN had to pay people to go in  and sit in her rally – 100 people verus 10,000 for Trumps rallies.  You can try to fool the people with the media publishing all of these fake polls stating that Clinton is ahead; but, we shall see who gets the most votes.  They have been caught manipulating the people and numbers to get the results they need.

Clinton is still being badgered with Wilileaks and there is still more to come and then you have the Clinton Foundation foaming at the brim with  slime.  It seems a Senator is questioning why the Department of Justice is not investigating all of the information that is being put in their lap.  Just more corruption with our lady justice.  Just think she has to live with this slime in the ice machine every time  she goes out in public and to think someone said she was “honest” during her tenure in New York.  Maybe they didn’t look under her skirt which is now showing signs of her slip is showing.

Clinton goes negative with Trump

Niall Stanage

Clinton slams Trump for Obama ISIS comment (which is true Obama and Hillary did establish and form ISIS.)

Hillary Clinton is keeping a negative focus on Donald Trump in her campaign ads, which rarely focus on positive reasons why voters should back her campaign for the White House.

Polls at present show her leading by a substantial margin nationally and across most battlegrounds, while even states that are usually GOP strongholds, such as Utah and Georgia, could be in play.

“Her job right now is to beat the devil out of Trump while his negatives are up, to ensure those negatives remain in place even if he stages some kind of resurgence later,” said Hank Sheinkopf, a Democratic strategist in New York who has worked for Clinton in the past but has not done so during this campaign.

(Sheinkopf, a Jew, needs to explain to America why Jews keep backing Dem’s when they give them hell all of the time?)

(It will be hard to beat the devil out of Trump when she is the devil.)

“He does stupid things, she does stupid things, it doesn’t matter – just keep hitting him in the head,” Sheinkopf added. “The minute she lets Trump up, it will be a very bad day.”

Some Democrats and independent observers argue that Clinton should at least offer voters more reasons why they ought to back her – beyond keeping Trump out of the White House.

“You have to do both. It’s not an either/or,” said one Democratic strategist, who spoke anonymously to offer candid remarks.

“The damage to Trump has been primarily self-inflicted and I think as you go forward, it’s a question of how you balance it. At some point you want to make this about your vision going forward, so that you can lock down those voters.”

Clinton’s campaign ads often come with an ominous piano soundtrack even as her rallies are powered by positive pop anthems by Katy Perry and Rachel Platten. The most notable ad of her campaign shows children watching as Trump makes some of his most incendiary comments. (Clinton appears, though briefly, in a positive light at the end of the ad.)

Another more recent spot uses a 2012 appearance by Trump on “The Late Show with David Letterman.” Letterman goes through Trump-branded shirts and ties that turn out to have been manufactured outside the United States, as the future candidate looks increasingly uncomfortable.

The commercial is intended to make Trump’s promise to bring jobs back to the United States look insincere and hypocritical.

Outside groups seeking to support Clinton’s candidacy have adopted a similar tone.

In early June, the main pro-Clinton super-PAC, Priorities USA, said it would spend $20 million to air an ad showing the parents of a disabled young girl expressing their horror about Trump’s mockery of a New York Times reporter who suffers from a rare joint condition. The same group later that same month released another ad disparaging Trump’s readiness to serve as commander-in-chief.

Clinton World can push back on any criticism that the former secretary of State is being overly negative by pointing to Trump’s approach. The GOP nominee constantly seeks to tar Clinton as “Crooked Hillary.” In more recent appearances, he has alleged that she is “unbalanced” and “close to unhinged.”

A remark he made at a rally on Tuesday about “second amendment people” was widely criticized since it seemed to raise the possibility – jokingly or otherwise – of violence against Clinton.

(No different when Bush I gave Trump a “throat cut” at the Houston, TX, debate.  Didn’t see the news media come out of the wood work to make any noise – was that okay?)

This has already been done remember this:

In that context, some Democrats argue that Clinton is fully justified in keeping the pressure on Trump. They also say that she needs to do so in order to drive home the advantage she currently enjoys, after Trump made a number of self-inflicted errors in recent weeks – notably by engaging in a public battle with the parents of Humayun Khan, a U.S. Army captain who was killed in Iraq.

Outside observers say that given Clinton’s own vulnerabilities when it comes to personal likability and honesty, the negative approach makes sense.

“Her biggest asset is the fact that she is running against Donald Trump – that’s clear,” said Grant Reeher, a political science professor at Syracuse University. “You have two candidates with super-high negative ratings. For her the strongest case is the negative case, [whereas] you normally see a mix of the ‘happy face’ commercials with the ominous ones.”

(These high negatives for Trump are made up  and the manipulated numbers have been made up by the news media and the professors who have ants in their pants and shaking in their boots when the American people throw them out on their communist ear.)

Negative ads are hardly unusual.

According to an analysis by the Wesleyan Media project, 43.2 percent of the ads President Obama ran in his first general election campaign, in 2008, were negative. Four years later, when he was running for reelection in challenging economic circumstances, that figure rose to 58.5 percent.

For now, much of the sense that Clinton is running a negative ad war is based upon anecdotal evidence, with viewers reporting that positive spots in battleground states are a rarity, far outnumbered by anti-Trump commercials.

Such a negative campaign could result in a new president entering office with depleted political capital. But for now, Democrats won’t complain, so long as Clinton wins in November.

“What she is doing is working,” said Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons. “So I feel like she should keep doing it.”

(Yeah – it is working only in the manipulated eyes of the beholders.  Why is it they have to hire people to attend her rallies?)

kommonsentsjane