The Dem’s keep accusing  Trump of taking America back to the dark ages during the Republican Convention.  I think they should be trying to pin the tail on a   donkey instead of a work  horse – Trump.  How much further back in history can  you go if you start talking about “slavery?”

Why is it the Democrats won’t let go of the past – they are still talking about slavery as if the present day black person were still under the umbrella of slavery?  The present day white person or black person had nothing to do with slavery; but, you wouldn’t know that by the way these politicians “cling” to this slavery subject.  Just another part of this Jesse Jackson theory, “if you stop complain’, you stop gettin’.”

One other part of Michelle’s story and O’Reilly story, neither one of them covered the fact that Harry Truman had the White House completely gutted, except for the walls, and rebuilt by union contractors.  So what is the BEEF?  And how does Michelle and O’Reilly know that slaves built the original White House?  Were they present at the time?  With the way the Democrats rewrite history, it might have been Mexican, Italian, German, or who knows Harry Truman gutted the White House

Question:   What are Hillary’s Plan in regards to ISIS?

Instead of talking about slaves – why isn’t the Democratic Party talking about ISIS?  No one asks them – WHAT ARE HILLARY’S PLAN TO BEAT ISIS OR ISIL?  The reason why is –  because that party is a part of ISIS – Hillary Clinton and Obama are the originators of ISIS.

Someone needs to ask them a few questions about Obama and Islam in America and why he has tried to turn this country into a Muslim country.  Look at our schools, no hint of Christianity but Muslim doctrine is included, look at our Military, Christianity purged and Islam installed and all tactics of defeating Islam has been removed from the Military manuals (how about that), and look at our government – the cup runneth over with Muslims in the Obama administration, the Military, the State Department, and the Pentagon?

Have you heard anything about the Middle East and the  Europe immigration crisis and murders and have you heard anything about the Democrats opening the U.S. borders and bringing in illegals by train, bus, on foot, and plane (even buying their tickets to get them here?  All of this expense is being taken out of Social Security.  Then they start talkin’ about Social Security is going broke.  What irresponsibility!  This party has a lot to answer for and why isn’t Bernie’s group asking those questions?

The truth is the Democratic Party is a facade.  Just take a look at the voting which is taking place in the Democratic  Party and the votes Bernie Sanders , a socialist, received.   That only tells  you the Democratic Party is now the party of communists and Muslims.  Do they realize if  you are a communists or Muslim you cannot fall  under the  umbrella of the Constitution?

TOO MANY QUESTIONS AND NO ANSWERS UNDER THIS UMBRELLA!   WHAT ARE THEY  – DEMOCRATS, SOCIALIST, OR MUSLIMS?  WHICH IS IT?  Looking at the  direction Obama  has taken the country , he wants to start another experiment with the Muslims and the American people – dump them on the world and the world will take care of them because they are not educated or trained for anything but HATE.  The government did the same thing with the blacks and it is not working – the blacks don’t want to learn to take responsibility – they also want to be taken care of – everything free..

© Provided by Vox.com
Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Too bad they were still slaves.

A day after Michelle Obama proved progress is possible by speaking about her historical legacy as the first black first lady “living in a house built by slaves,” Bill O’Reilly decided to give a positive spin on slavery itself.

“Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802,” O’Reilly said on the latest edition of the The O’Reilly Factor Tuesday night. “However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well.”

O’Reilly is right that slaves weren’t the only ones who built the White House. Technically, enslaved black people were joined by free black people and local white laborers. But black people, many of them slaves, did the bulk of the heavy lifting and digging.

This reluctance to view slavery, or the tokens we carry through history that were created as a benefit of slavery, as horrific or difficult has been a long journey for most Americans. Only recently are popular representations of slavery appropriately brutal and representative of the reality of the practice.

It’s not surprising that O’Reilly finds comfort in portraying the nation he loves in a way that depicts slaves as having “decent lodgings.” The fact that slave owners were paid for their slaves’ labor while the slaves’ names were lost to history says everything about how the institution of slavery — and the price African Americans have had to pay — is remembered by far too many Americans today.

All of this  nonsense about slaves when none of these people who are trying to talk about slavery know NOTHING about and only want to pull it out of the closet again to try to win a winless point.

Obama and Michelle should have talked about the ISIS point instead.

kommonsentsjane