June 14, 2016

Microsoft is buying  Linkedin for a lot of money – which will be one more monopoly.  Where is the government in all of this?

June 11, 2016 PM

After sending this out – now they are after me.   But that is okay, I have been putting up with this blatant censorship on my paid website since 2013.  Just remember all of you tech people – every dog has his day and you won’t be protected forever.  You will be running for the hills before it is all over and hope your company stock does too.

After further thought, just think these tech giants are calculating the votes and conducting the polls for this upcoming election.  There is no where  in hell that I would trust them.  No wonder Obama won the last time.  If you are in control you can rig the numbers – which now proves they did.

The polls are always rigged.  Just like the Fox poll that came out – it was rigged in Hillary’s favor. There is no way the America people with the way they feel that she is nothing but a lying crook that her numbers would have gone up.  Once a crook always a crook.   Look at the media and how they blew the “judge” controversy this past week to help Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney with their attempted coup.

Look at the $16.5 Bill Clinton received for being a honorary chancellor for the Laureate College.  Has the media come to play this melody – no because Obama and Hillary are up to their eyeballs in this big, big scam?

When I looked it up in Microsoft initially – it gave not one bit of information.  The slate was clean.

June 11, 2016 AM

I can attest to this fact because they have been harassing me since 2013.  I have filed complaint after complaint and even wrote a blog Performance Assessment to no avail.  I have threatened then even with a law suit.

But, Microsoft is just as bad.  Someone needs to rat them out too!

The question on Fox this morning was geared to Google Search – it is not only that web host but there is also another group affiliate who are even worse – Automattics, Inc.,  who handles WordPress for Google.  They have manipulated my internet name by changing it from kommonsentsjane  to blogkomonsents to mislead people on how to find it on the internet.   They split the information according to the subjects.

The workers constantly harass the site during the time I am working by actually deleting what I have written.  I continue to receive notes stating that the blog is not set up properly in the internet workings  for it to be identified which I have nothing to do with – that is Aromattics job.  These people need to be disciplined.  This is not a free website that I use.

Here Are 10 More Examples of Google Search Results Favorable to Hillary

Tech giant accused of whitewashing autocomplete results

BY: Brent Scher and Elizabeth Harrington
June 10, 2016 1:30 pm
“Crime” and “indictment” are not the only terms Google is keeping hidden from searches of Hillary Clinton, a Washington Free Beacon analysis finds.

Common search terms associated with Clinton appear to have been scrubbed from Google as the tech giant has been accused of manipulating its autocomplete results to favor the Democratic presidential candidate.

Matt Lieberman of SourceFed released a video showing examples of Google skewing its autocomplete results for Clinton, while other search engines simply display the most searched terms.

“While researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton,” SourceFed wrote. “If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm.”

For example, when searching Hillary Clinton “cri,” Google finishes the phrase as “crime reform.” On Yahoo, the result is “criminal charges.” On Google’s own trend website, there were not enough searches for Hillary Clinton and “crime reform” to build a graph of the results.

Typing Hillary Clinton and “ind” gives Google users results on Hillary Clinton and Indiana. On Microsoft’s Bing search engine, a user gets Hillary Clinton and “indictment,” yielding results for the FBI investigation into Clinton’s private email server.

Just putting the name “Hillary Clinton” into Google, you are directed towards searches for her “twitter,” “email,” “age,” and “speech.”

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.08.43 AM

Notably missing is the second top result on Bing, which is of her potential “indictment.”

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.08.51 AM

Here are 10 more examples of questionable Google autocompletes for Clinton:

1. “Hillary Clinton anti…”

Bing gets you antichrist, antisemitic, and anti gay marriage.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.14.37 AM

Google gets you “anti obama ad.”

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.14.56 AM

2. “Hillary Clinton vin…”

Bing gets you vindictive and a variety of searches focusing on the death of Vince Foster.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.09.29 AM

Google recommends a search for a compilation of Vines.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.09.19 AM-2

3. “Hillary Clinton ga…”

Bing thinks the user is looking for her gaffes or maybe her shaky view on gay marriage.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.00.38 AM

Google thinks the user is researching her Gameboy?

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.00.45 AM

4. “Hillary Clinton hum…”

Bing directs you to Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin and whether she is Clinton’s lover.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.10.06 AM

Google directs you towards a look at Clinton’s humor and her status as a humanitarian.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.10.13 AM

5. “Hillary Clinton cro…”

Bing sends you over to crook or crooked.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.01.17 AM

Google sends you to cross-stitch, a common embroidery method.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.01.24 AM

6. “Hillary Clinton un…”

On Bing, unlikable, untrustworthy, and under investigation top the list.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.05.06 AM

On Google, universal health care jumps to the top of the list.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.05.11 AM

7. “Hillary Clinton aff…”

Bing’s top suggestion is a look into Clinton affairs.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.08.18 AM

That suggestion is absent from Google.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.08.24 AM

8. “Hillary Clinton whi…”

Top result on Bing is the Whitewater scandal.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.02.13 AM

This is also absent from Google, leaving just searches for Clinton doing the whip and nae nae, which are dance moves for young people.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.02.19 AM

9. “Hillary Clinton mon…”

Bing guesses that its user is looking into either Monsanto or Monica Lewinsky.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.04.29 AM

No way a Google user could be looking into Monica Lewinsky.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.04.23 AM

10. “Hillary Clinton li…”

Bing goes for lies, Libya, and liar.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.04.42 AM

Google goes for LinkedIn and lipstick.

Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 11.04.48 AM
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged Hillary Clinton. Bookmark the permalink.
Share

Tweet

Email
Is Google manipulating search results to favor Hillary Clinton?  And so is Microsoft!

Washington Examiner

You darn tootin’ they are!  This monopoly needs to be broken up and give others a break in the tech world.  Google and Microsoft should not be the only ones making billions of dollars off of the people of the world.

kommonsentsjane