The Kentucky election for governor is a good example on how dishonest polls in this country are.  The person who lost was 10 points ahead of the winner in the polls.  This was done so that people would vote for the loser.  So this shows you that you cannot believe these polls.

We also have found that you cannot believe these polls in the last two elections.  The country knows the people who are conducting and paying for these polls are skewing these polls for political purposes.  The polls are being used by the sponsors to steer people in a certain direction.  So is this called junk science?

This writer has been questioning the polling date for the 2016 election since the media and the TV media are all in bed with the administration and is so over the top dishonest in the way the candidates are being treated.  It also tells me that the debates are a sham because the moderators also are liberals and cannot be trusted.

It was very evident in the Republican debate which was moderated by liberals that the purpose of the questions asked were to make the candidates looked stupid and to help the Democratic Party candidates.   In the Democrats debate, the questions were  all softball questions almost to the absurd.  So everyone knew the debate was a fix to make Clinton look good.

Another big problem with the debates is that at NBC’s David Axelrod works there and all of you have to remember he was Obama’s protegé.  So that alone tells you how dishonest these debates are going to be because he is not an honest person.

kommonsentsjane