The Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%.’  When you prove it then the American people will come to the table.  Just because these liars say it is so – doesn’t make it so as we have found out in the past – their track record for the truth is – NOT SO GOOD!  Doesn’t even hit the 1% mark!

What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?  That same old Saul Alinsky crap!  If you say it enough,  the low-information crowd come to believe it!

***********************************
By
Joseph Bast And  Roy Spencer

Secretary of State John Kerry warned graduating students at Boston College of the “crippling consequences” of climate change. “Ninety-seven percent of the world’s scientists,” he added, “tell us this is urgent.”

Where did Mr. Kerry get the 97% figure? Perhaps from his boss, President Obama, who tweeted on May 16 that “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” Or maybe from NASA, which posted (in more measured language).

Whether you believe there is global warming or not, following is the proof:

****************************************

Doug Ross @ Journal

Monday, September 21, 2015

These 20 Scientists Want to Make it A Crime to Disagree with Them!  And they are teaching our children – their political views should be kept outside of the class room.

I think it is important to publicize these names far and wide:

•Jagadish Shukla, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•Edward Maibach, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•Paul Dirmeyer, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•Barry Klinger, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•Paul Schopf, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
•Edward Sarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
•Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
•Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
•Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
•William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
•Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
•T.N. Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
•Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
•Ben Kirtman, University of Miami, Miami, FL
•Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX
•Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
•Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY
•Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
•Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT

These 20 people, who nominally call themselves “scientists”, have written a letter to President Obama urging him to use the RICO statute to prosecute people who disagree with them on climate science, essentially putting scientific agreement in the same status as organized crime. If they can’t win the scientific debate with persurasion, they will win it with guns. From the letter:

One additional tool – recently proposed by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse – is a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) investigation of corporations and other organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.

Of course “deceive the American people” is defined by these folks in practice as “disagreeing with us”.

kommonsentsjane