The only thing the American people want to know is the TRUE story about Benghazi.  The responsibility of this administration has to be defined in this tragedy.  After this McCarthy guy spoke – I hope all of you take a good look locally, even for dog catcher, please don’t vote for a politician or a lawyer – from the bottom to the top!  See what happens!

My question is, why did Kevin McCarthy make the statement that he did?  The reasons  were – first, McCarthy was trying to help Boehner out, who is a RHINO working and voting with his golf buddy, Obama; and, second,  he was trying to help the Obama and Clinton administration smoothly slide out of this Benghazi quagmire.  This was all done as another trick by these people to make the Benghazi Committee and Trey Gowdy look bad.  We have to understand that McCarthy is just Boehner LIGHT.

Since it looks like we have no adults  in the room of the House – my suggestion is to bring someone from the outside like Senator Tom Coburn (since he knows how the system works and all of the corruption), who was an outstanding senator and wrote many books on the corruption in Obama’s administration or Newt Gingrich, who is the ex-Speaker of the House.  It would not hurt any of this group to have someone come in and give these people some training on both sides of the aisle.

Both the Republican and Democrat senators and congressmen had the whole month of August off and what have either party done or achieved since they have been back.  Now they are off for another whole week.  We need to have a new way of doing business and only paying them for doing business not for vacationing.

Hillary Clinton calls McCarthy’s Benghazi committee comments ‘deeply distressing’.  (This woman has to be the biggest liar that I have ever witnessed.  When judgement day comes for her – the witnesses’ testimony will be singing that song “LIGHT MY FIRE,” while Hillary will be singing,”A Candle in the Wind.”)

Hillary Clinton on Benghazi committee: ‘If I were president … I would have done everything to shut it down’.  (God help us if that happens because her track will continue on the railroad that Obama has built.)

John Boehner stuck in limbo as speaker after Kevin McCarthy withdraws bid.  (This is all part of Boehner and McCarthy’s plan to delay Boehner leaving.  He knew his statement would throw everything up in the air.  Boehner then spoke up quickly and stated that he would not leave until a new speaker was on board. All part of the Obama/Boehner, McCarthy plan because Boehner  wants to be sure that his last gift to Obama is the largest Obama’s GRAND THEFT DEBT.

Ex-Benghazi investigator: ‘This has become a partisan investigation’ hyper-focused on Hillary Clinton.    (Just another Democrat plan to not find out the truth.  We have to remember this guy is part of Obama’s Pentagon and is protecting Obama’s backside.  Remember the Pentagon and State Department are infiltrated with Muslims.)

Dylan Stableford
‎October‎ ‎11‎, ‎2015
A former investigator with the congressional Select Committee on Benghazi says the probe into the Sept. 11, 2012, terror attacks that killed four Americans — including Ambassador Chris Stevens — morphed into a politically motivated mission targeting Hillary Clinton after the revelation that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.

“This has become a partisan investigation,” Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve, told CNN. “I do not know the reason for the hyper-focus on Hillary Clinton.”

Podliska, who spent 10 months as an investigator for the Republican-led panel, says he was fired in June for resisting pressure to focus his efforts on Clinton.

“I was fired for trying to conduct an objective, nonpartisan, thorough investigation,” Podliska said in an interview with Jake Tapper that aired on “State of the Union” Sunday.

Podliska said he is planning to file a lawsuit against the committee over the firing next month.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the committee refuted Podliska’s claims.

“We are confident that the facts and evidence give no support to the wild imagination fueling these and any future allegations, and the committee will vigorously defend itself against such allegations,” the statement reads. “The committee will not be blackmailed into a monetary settlement for a false allegation made by a properly terminated former employee.”

Podliska’s comments come amid mounting calls from Clinton and other Democrats to shut down the committee.  (What are they afraid of October 22 is almost here?)

“This committee was set up, as they have admitted, for the purpose of making a partisan political issue out of the deaths of four Americans,” an angry Clinton said on the “Today” show last week. “I would never have done that, and if I were president and there were Republicans or Democrats thinking about that, I would have done everything to shut it down.”  (Sorry, Mrs. Liar, it is not your call.)

Clinton is scheduled to testify before the committee on Oct. 22.

Last month, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested that the committee was summoned to derail the former secretary of state’s 2016 presidential bid.  (This was part of Boehner, McCarthy’s and McConnell’s plan to help out Obama and Hillary so that people will never learn the truth.   Remember we still have not seen Hillary’s private emails during the Benghazi time.  And the fact, Boehner drug his feet for the longest (two years?) before a committee was formed and not because he wanted to have a special committee with Gowdy heading it.)

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” McCarthy said on Fox News. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers Friday? What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought.”  (This guy must think people are stupid or either he is.  Now this guy is playing dumb and even went so far to throw the people off with his affair business – amazing to what length these people won’t go.)

But Podliska insists his motivation to come forward has nothing to do with Clinton’s candidacy.  (Yep, he is just one of Obama’s patsy’s.  Wouldn’t want him fighting in any war.)

“I do not support Hillary Clinton for president,” Podliska, who describes himself as a libertarian-leaning Republican, said. “I am going to vote for the Republican nominee in 2016.”  (Sure???)

He said he decided to speak out because the families of the Benghazi victims deserve it.  (If that is the case than why don’t you want the truth?)

“I knew that we needed to get the truth to the victims’ families. And the victims’ families, they deserve the truth — whether or not Hillary Clinton was involved, whether or not other individuals were involved,” he said. “The victims’ families are not going to get the truth, and that’s the most unfortunate thing about this.”

Podliska added, “Hillary Clinton has a lot of explaining to do. We, however, did not need to shift resources to hyper-focus on Hillary Clinton. We didn’t need to de-emphasize and in some cases drop the investigation on different agencies, on different organizations and different individuals.”

(Just look how many committees have investigated Benghazi with one eye closed to keep from finding out the truth.  And just look at this Bergdahl trial.  It is a joke!  Remember Obama fired all of the honest military generals so he could have this kind of guy because he knew what was ahead of him.)

(Oh! What a web they weave to deceive and  to cover the truth!)

Sure wouldn’t trust this guy – even with my Grandmother!

kommonsentsjane