The following was taken from an earlier blog to show you just how corrupt this administration is even with the new Department of Justice leader.  The next paragraph tells you how these Democrats used their own company called “CATALIST”  database to corrupt the election.

I have read story after story about people going to the polls and when they tried to vote Republican it would immediately jump and vote for the Democratic side.  So in the future when you vote always check your ballot to be sure it is voting for the party you are actually voting for.  That is what we get when we become so sophisticated that we out smart ourselves.  When I vote, early, I still request a paper ballot because the computer systems are corrupt AND all of the owners of these systems back and work for Obama.

The Justice Department also pumped untold thousands of dollars into a database run by a company called Catalist. This database has been populated with data provided by the Democratic National Committee, unions, and other liberal organizations and is used to help them win elections. Catalist’s infrastructure and database are expensive to maintain, but fear not: the Justice Department, in the North Carolina trial and elsewhere, has provided federal tax dollars to its expert witnesses so that they could purchase Catalist’s proprietary data. Yes, federal dollars were used to fund a database that will be used next year to try to win the 2016 election for Democratic candidates.

The second paragraph below pointed out their Democratic  black voters were “less sophisticated.”  Are these DOJ people calling their own voters “stupid?”    Stating they could not figure out which button to push?  The ballot states “if you want to vote a straight Democrat ballot just mark or punch – unbelievable?

For all the resources expended, the Justice Department’s entire case was built on speculative claims. Not able to produce a single eligible voter who was or would be unable to vote, the plaintiffs relied on hypothetical statistical arguments to claim that the turnout of black voters would be “suppressed” because they might use early voting and same-day registration slightly more than white voters, and because black voters are “less sophisticated voters.” DOJ experts actually made the borderline racist argument that “it’s less likely to imagine” that black voters could “figure out or would avail themselves of other forms of registering and voting.” That’s a shameful way to enforce a law that was used to protect real victims of real discrimination in the Deep South.

In the end, real statistics destroyed the Justice Department’s case. The reforms the plaintiffs claimed would disenfranchise “less sophisticated” black voters didn’t depress turnout at all. Indeed, in comparison with the 2010 primary, the turnout of black voters actually increased a whopping 29.5 percent in the May 2014 primary election, while the turnout of whites increased only 13.7 percent. The same thing happened in the general election. This knocked the stuffing out of the plaintiff’s discrimination claims.

The following paragraph has really gone one step too far by claiming that these people are incapable of performing basic societal functions and that they must step in.  If that is the case – why are they voting in the first place if they can’t comprehend what to do or what they are doing.

The Justice Department still holds a thoroughly demeaning view of civil-rights law. It is a view that insists that blacks are incapable of performing basic societal functions, and therefore the law must step in any time they are asked to comply with a simple procedural step to participate in the electoral process. This is not only an abuse of the department’s authority; it’s a misuse of the Voting Rights Act. It should not be tolerated.

In Texas the DOJ is doing the same thing – going to court and trying to erase the law of having a valid picture identification to vote.  The DOJ states that is not fair to make people show proof they are who they are.  It only proves they want to corrupt the election.

Folks this is what we are dealing with – a corrupt DOJ.  It was thought when Holder left under pressure that this woman Lynch would be different – not so – it is just a woman who is corrupting the system instead of a man who all starts at the top.  We must continue to monitor and stop these evil people.

kommonsentsjane