KOMMONSENTSJANE – WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF THEY WERE OLD OR NEW WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

How many Democrat reports did we see when Bush was in office about “there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq” when America invaded Iraq? Over and over,  the Pentagon, the Democrats, the administration, and media reported that Bush (the cowboy) went in under false pretenses with guns blazing.  Now the Democrats are splitting peas – we don’t care whether these weapons were “old or new” – the fact that Saddam was in possession of  WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION is what counts.  The oil has risen to the surface again about these lieing Democrats.  Now Jarrod Lampier,  a retired Army major, was said to be present when 2,400 nerve-agent rockets were discovered in 2006.  His comment was, “Nothing of significance”  is what I was ordered to say (about our findings).  Now the real story is surfacing which follows:

Troops’ Exposure to Chemical Weapons Concealed

Unknown's avatar

About kommonsentsjane

Enjoys sports and all kinds of music, especially dance music. Playing the keyboard and piano are favorites. Family and friends are very important.
This entry was posted in Kommonsentsjane - Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq After All and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment