The Supreme Court ruled that states can require a photo identification when voting.  It seems that our guy Holder is not real happy with this ruling and is trying to “loop hole” the voting process by claiming states who have discriminated in the past have to get his approval before they can  go along with the Supreme Court.  I wonder why he doesn’t want the voters to show a picture identification?  Do you think he has an ulterior motive?  Since when did this little fellow become more important than the Supreme Court?  I wonder how many states will “show him the door” when he comes a calling?  Our motto in Texas is “Don’t Mess with Texas.”  I wonder if anyone will “pin the tale” on this donkey?

January 18, 2014

Yesterday, a judge in Virginia ruled that the state did not need to show a photo identification (ID) when voting.  I bet that judge was a Socialist Democrat.  What is it these judges don’t understand about the ruling of the Supreme Court that a photo ID is needed for voting so that you do not have all of these people voting that are dead or illegal?  The bulk of the people in Virginia are government employees – so we know they have an ID.  I think the people of Virginia better wake up!

kommonsentsjane