Majority of Europeans support Trump’s visa ban – sure they do – they know the hell they have been through and they are now in the process of trying to change their country and reverse what Merkel, Hollande, Cameron, and Obama did to them.

Obama insisted on endangering U.S. national security by bringing in “refugees” and “migrants” from Syria and other Muslim countries despite the FBI’s admission that they don’t have the information needed to properly vett them to screen out terrorists. On January 27, 2016, President Trump fulfilled his campaign promise of barring terrorists from being brought as […]

via Majority of Europeans support Trump’s visa ban — Fellowship of the Minds

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

As the saying goes, “It is better to be safe than sorry.”

The logic behind “better safe than sorry.

It struck me that the phrase “better safe than sorry” is somewhat illogical, or perhaps more accurately, it is so logical and obvious that it seems to carry no meaning at all.

My problem with this phrase is that it compares two things (being safe, and being sorry), one of which is obviously good, while the other is obviously bad. Clearly, being safe is better than the “base state”, which in turn is better than being sorry. This is in contrast with another common phrase “prevention is better than cure”, in which both prevention and cure presumably carry some cost, and the costs are compared in a very logical manner.

Obama said, “he would change this country;” but, no one realized to what extent he would degrade the country which was his intentions to start with.

Why did Obama let all of these people into the country – strictly to continue the “One World Order and wealth distribution and the big part was for “democrat votes.”  And help him create chaos with George Soros’ help.  Plain and simple!

How many times do we have to go through the “SORRY PART?”  Haven’t we learned our lesson with these terrorists after Boston, San Bernardino, and Miami?

kommonsentsjane